There's been a lot written recently about a new study that claims that the jazz audience is dying and it looks clear that the music is going to face a challenge in finding new listeners in years to come. Now, more than ever, it is vital that there are players that have something original to say if jazz is not going to become a museum piece with an overwhelming past and no future.
Now I don't believe for one second that jazz is dead and I remain utterly convinced that it is a music that anyone can enjoy. I agree with Terry Treacher in the article I linked to that the challenge is how to market the music to a new generation.
However, I am also equally convinced that 95% of jazz gigs are derivative and boring and not helping the situation at all.
You know those gigs you see, the ones you probably play (I know I certainly do) where you turn out with a scratch band and plough through a load of standards in the usual mainstream way, in the way that you and every other jazz musician on the planet has done a million times before? The gigs where all the arrangements are more or less the same, where the endings of tunes are always either a cliché or a bit of a train wreck? The gigs where mixing it up consists of interchanging swing tunes, bossas and the odd ballad? The gigs that are basically just jam sessions but with the same line up for the whole night?
Those gigs are just boring; and they're killing jazz.
And just in case anyone reading this has been playing these gigs and is having a defensive, knee-jerk reaction that says I'm wrong, let me ask you this: when was the last time you told a load of your friends and family that they should come along to your scratch gig because it was going to be a great night?
Another equally valid question: when was the last time that you saw one of these gigs full of musicians who were there just to listen? Unless there is the opportunity to sit in or a big name is playing, even other jazz musicians can't be bothered to go to gigs most of the time. If the people who love jazz enough to dedicate huge chunks of their lives to absorbing and learning to play this music don’t find most gigs interesting enough to attend, then why should anyone else?
Look, I know as well as anyone how difficult it can be, especially if you're trying to make a living as a musician. So many of the venues are really booking background music and the pay is so bad for many of them that you can't afford to rehearse with a band for a one-off gig that pays you about minimum wage when you factor in travelling time, setting-up and packing-down gear and so on.
So I'm not saying that we shouldn't do the restaurant, function, background, 'wallpaper' gigs - after all, they're bread-and-butter for many of us and put food on the table. I understand all too well that we've got to earn money and pay the bills and, like most working musicians, I'm not in a position to turn away paying work because of some flighty delusion of my own worth as an 'artist'. But that doesn't mean that I have to sell my musical soul, it doesn't mean that I have to surrender my whole musical life for a pay-check, it doesn’t mean that has to be the only music I play.
What I am saying is this: if we want jazz to have a future, we all have a responsibility to pull our fingers out and start trying to come up with something worthwhile that's going to put bums on seats and create an audience. And just to be perfectly clear, this doesn't mean that we have to dumb the music down even further and turn it into bland jazz-pop or 'smooth' jazz. It means we have to start playing music we believe in and it means we’re going to have to start believing in ourselves.
I know too many good players who only ever play generic mainstream gigs with scratch bands – and it's such a huge waste. I do firmly believe that jazz has a future and I also firmly believe that we have the musicians with the creativity and passion and potential to take the music in new directions. I am also equally convinced that we can't just leave it to the 'big names' to do it for us.
Brad Mehldau may well be one of the most unique jazz voices to emerge for years and he has deservedly become a massive name in the music world; E.S.T. were a trio with a unique sound that started to bring jazz to an audience more familiar with rock and pop.
Does it then follow that the success of these artists should automatically make people want to come and listen to me going through the motions on the 'The Girl From Ipanema' in a local wine bar with a load of other jaded musicians who idly dream of getting a 'decent' gig, but who wouldn't have a proper band or any material to play even if they did?
If we are going to find a new audience for jazz then we all need to take responsibility and start playing some music that we are truly passionate about, that moves us and that sounds, not like a pastiche of every mainstream band the world has ever seen, but like us.
Now if it's the case that ploughing that well-established furrow of standards with scratch bands is what really gets your musical juices flowing, if that's what lights your spark and makes you glad to be a musician then you keep doing that and do it to the very best of you ability. But if that doesn't fill you up, if it doesn't satisfy your deepest creative desires then start playing something that does.
Rank-and-file jazz musicians have been musical prostitutes for too long. We have been watering down our music for an imagined audience we perceive as too ignorant, uneducated or uncool to appreciate the Real Thing. The irony is, not only are people who would be blown away by the Real Thing not coming to the gigs anymore - the people we assumed we were pandering too aren't coming either.
We've got to make a change, and as a global community of jazz musicians we need to do it together. We need to start making music that we would want to go and listen to ourselves. We need to show the world what's so great about this music that we love and we need to start doing it from the grassroots up. We need to get in front of people in our home towns and cities and start playing music we believe in. We've got to get some fire in our bellies, curb our cynicism and frustration and start believing in ourselves and the power of our music.
In other words, we need to start playing proper jazz. And we need to do it now.
I’ve mentioned before how ego can impair a musical performance. One of the most common causes of overplaying is a need to impress and demonstrate technical ability to other players.
When you use backing tracks in your practice, it’s natural to focus mostly on what you're playing but it’s vital you don’t do this on the bandstand. You need to keep your ears open at all times and try and give equal weight to all the instruments in your mind. This way, you’ll have a much better conception of the ensemble sound and will be much closer to perceiving the music as the audience does.
This is easier said than done, but before you hit your first note, try and let go of all your fears, your hopes, your insecurities, your need to impress, your need for respect and recognition and your desire to play well; all of these things will only hinder you on the bandstand. It can sometimes help to picture all of these things being formed into a ball in your mind, which you can mentally throw away before you play.
This is the situation that spawned
For the great players, overplaying is a purely aesthetical problem – i.e. would a good solo have been improved by leaving more space? However for most of us, overplaying leads to a whole host of problems when our facility doesn’t match our ambition - when our hands aren’t as quick as our brains.
When we practice improvising over changes, in order to try and get to the stage where we can do anything, we often try and play everything. The goal is to get to the stage where technique doesn’t limit our ideas, our musical mind is in charge and all options are open to us on the bandstand.




